{
    "abstract": "Monitoring of impedance field telemetry is crucial to maintaining optimal function of cochlear implants. This study aims to investigate impedance changes in cochlear implant electrodes one year after switch on.\nA retrospective repeated crosssectional study was conducted by recruiting patients with cochlear implants presenting to the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia between 2017 and 2021. Basal (b1, b2) and apical (a1, a2) electrodes, representing the outermost and innermost parts of the cochlear implant electrodes, were measured at switch on and at 1 year post-implantation.\nA total of 123 patients, with a total of 123 cochlear implant samples, were included in the analysis. We found a substantial change in electrical impedance between switch on and follow-up periods, where the impedance levels of basal electrodes decreased (b1: mean difference (MD) -1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.71, -0.54], p<0.001; b2: MD -0.60 [95%CI: -1.17, -0.03], p=0.041) and those of apical electrodes increased (a1: MD 0.48 [95%CI: -0.28, 0.99], p=0.064; a2: MD 0.67 [95%CI: 0.12, 1.22], p=0.017). We also found that the choice of surgical approaches for implant insertion may affect the electrode impedance. Cochleostomy approach resulted in a higher impedance than round window in basal (b1) and apical (a2) electrodes both at switch on and follow-up (b1 at switch on and at follow-up: p=0.019 and p=0.004; a2 at follow-up: p=0.012). Extended round window approach also resulted in a higher impedance than round window in basal (b1) and apical (a2) electrodes at follow-up (p=0.013 and p=0.003, respectively).\nElectrical impedance of cochlear implant electrodes may change over time, highlighting the importance of regular impedance assessments for cochlear implant users to ensure optimal device function. The round window approach resulted in better initial and long-term impedance levels compared to cochleostomy, and better long-term impedance levels than extended round window. Extended round window approach also gives better impedance level than cochleostomy. Further research should investigate the potential interplay between surgical approach and other factors that may impact impedance levels to confirm our findings.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Universitas Indonesia/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS), Jakarta, Indonesia. semiramiszizlavsky@gmail.com.",
            "firstname": "S",
            "initials": "S",
            "lastname": "Zizlavsky"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Universitas Indonesia/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS), Jakarta, Indonesia.",
            "firstname": "R",
            "initials": "R",
            "lastname": "Saleh"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Universitas Indonesia/Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS), Jakarta, Indonesia.",
            "firstname": "H",
            "initials": "H",
            "lastname": "Priyono"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": "Electrical impedance of cochlear implant electrodes may change over time, highlighting the importance of regular impedance assessments for cochlear implant users to ensure optimal device function. The round window approach resulted in better initial and long-term impedance levels compared to cochleostomy, and better long-term impedance levels than extended round window. Extended round window approach also gives better impedance level than cochleostomy. Further research should investigate the potential interplay between surgical approach and other factors that may impact impedance levels to confirm our findings.",
    "copyrights": null,
    "doi": null,
    "journal": "The Medical journal of Malaysia",
    "keywords": [],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2023-09-30",
    "pubmed_id": "37775484",
    "results": "A total of 123 patients, with a total of 123 cochlear implant samples, were included in the analysis. We found a substantial change in electrical impedance between switch on and follow-up periods, where the impedance levels of basal electrodes decreased (b1: mean difference (MD) -1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.71, -0.54], p<0.001; b2: MD -0.60 [95%CI: -1.17, -0.03], p=0.041) and those of apical electrodes increased (a1: MD 0.48 [95%CI: -0.28, 0.99], p=0.064; a2: MD 0.67 [95%CI: 0.12, 1.22], p=0.017). We also found that the choice of surgical approaches for implant insertion may affect the electrode impedance. Cochleostomy approach resulted in a higher impedance than round window in basal (b1) and apical (a2) electrodes both at switch on and follow-up (b1 at switch on and at follow-up: p=0.019 and p=0.004; a2 at follow-up: p=0.012). Extended round window approach also resulted in a higher impedance than round window in basal (b1) and apical (a2) electrodes at follow-up (p=0.013 and p=0.003, respectively).",
    "title": "Impedance changes in cochlear implant electrodes one year after switch on: A cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x7885042851c0>"
}