{
    "abstract": "There is no widely accepted standard for the classification and treatment of traumatic acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion due to the scarcity of this condition and the confusion of terminology.\nPubMed and Scopus were searched using \"scapular fracture\" and \"acromion fracture\" or \"scapular spine fracture\" as search terms. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. The exclusion criteria were cases without appropriate images. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles written in other languages. Fractures were classified using our newly proposed classification system.\nTwenty-nine patients (19 men, 10 women) with 29 nonunions were identified. There were four type I, 15 type II, and 10 type III fracture nonunions. Only 11 fractures were isolated. The mean period from initial injury to final diagnosis was 35.2\u2009\u00b1\u200973.2\u00a0months (range 3-360\u00a0months) (n\u2009=\u200925). The most frequent cause of delayed diagnosis was conservative treatment for fracture in 11 patients, followed by oversight by the physician in 8. The most common reason for seeking medical advice was shoulder pain. Six patients received conservative therapy, and 23 received operative treatment. Fixation materials included various plates in 15 patients, and tension band wiring in 5. Bone grafting was performed in 16 patients (73%, 16/22). Of the 19 surgically treated patients with adequate follow-up, the outcome was rated excellent in 79%.\nIsolated acromion/scapular spine fracture nonunion is rare. Fracture type II and III, arising in the anatomical scapular spine, accounted for 86% of the fractures. Computed tomography is required to prevent fracture oversight. Surgical therapy produces good stable results. However, it is important to select the appropriate surgical fixation method and material after considering the anatomical characteristics of the fracture and stress on the fractured portion.\nV.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eiju General Hospital, 2-23-16 Higashi-Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 110-8645, Japan. ogawa51@jcom.home.ne.jp.\nDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Eiju General Hospital, 2-23-16 Higashi-Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 110-8645, Japan. ogawa51@jcom.home.ne.jp.",
            "firstname": "Kiyohisa",
            "initials": "K",
            "lastname": "Ogawa"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.",
            "firstname": "Noboru",
            "initials": "N",
            "lastname": "Matsumura"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, 2-1 Suwa, Wako City, Saitama, 351-0102, Japan.",
            "firstname": "Atsushi",
            "initials": "A",
            "lastname": "Yoshida"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eiju General Hospital, 2-23-16 Higashi-Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 110-8645, Japan.",
            "firstname": "Wataru",
            "initials": "W",
            "lastname": "Inokuchi"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": "\u00a9 2023. The Author(s).",
    "doi": "10.1007/s00402-023-04912-z\n10.1097/00007611-192708000-00013\n10.1016/S0039-6109(16)37145-6\n10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.017\n10.1016/S0002-9610(37)90475-6\n10.2106/00004623-197759030-00012\n10.1097/00005373-198010000-00011\n10.1016/0020-1383(84)90056-1\n10.1007/s00402-009-0855-3\n10.1097/00005373-197506000-00002\n10.1097/00003086-199108000-00025\n10.1007/BF02015447\n10.1053/j.otsm.2004.04.010\n10.1186/1471-2474-15-302\n10.1007/BF00416305\n10.1097/00003086-197507000-00005\n10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80024-3\n10.1016/s1058-2746(97)90087-2\n10.2106/00004623-200003000-00010\n10.3928/01477447-20100429-11\n10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.06\n10.7860/JCDR/2017/21060.9312\n10.1002/aja.1000920203\n10.1007/BF00352547\n10.1097/00005131-199402000-00002\n10.5435/00124635-199501000-00004\n10.3109/17453670903025394\n10.1590/1413-785220162402141691\n10.1111/os.12764\n10.2106/00004623-197860080-00031\n10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80059-1\n10.1097/00005373-199211000-00034\n10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00033-8\n10.4103/0973-6042.42202\n10.1520/JFS2004497\n10.1007/s00256-014-2020-5\n10.1007/s00414-016-1466-5\n10.1148/rg.2015140254\n10.1007/s00256-015-2098-4\n10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00134-7\n10.1007/s00414-007-0189-z\n10.1136/bmj.n160\n10.1007/s00113-010-1818-4.inGerman\n10.1097/00005373-198303000-00014\n10.1016/0020-1383(93)90115-m\n10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80045-1\n10.1007/s11751-014-0210-2\n10.17554/j.issn.2311-5106.2017.04.236\n10.1097/BTO.0000000000000537\n10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.012\n10.1007/s00402-020-03351-4\n10.1007/s00402-019-03126-6\n10.1111/j.1755740.2011.00131.x\n10.3109/17453679808999274\n10.21474/IJAR01/9699\n10.18689/mjcrs-1000121\n10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00021.x\n10.1097/00005131-199901000-00016\n10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023\n10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009\n10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.427\n10.2106/JBJS.K.01516\n10.1097/00003086-199210000-00019\n10.1177/1758573215578587\n10.1007/s002640050376\n10.1097/00005131-200106000-00013\n10.2214/AJR.15.14446\n10.1302/2058-5241.6.200153\n10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.018\n10.1007/s10140-004-0376-x\n10.1080/02841850601026435\n10.1097/00003086-200106000-00012\n10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.035\n10.1007/s00264-015-2821-8\n10.5435/JAAOS-20-03-130\n10.1016/S0002-9610(40)90437-8\n10.1097/01.bot.0000435632.71393.bb",
    "journal": "Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery",
    "keywords": [
        "Acromion fracture",
        "Nonunion",
        "Scapular fracture",
        "Scapular spine fracture",
        "Terminology"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2023-06-14",
    "pubmed_id": "37314525\n14090204\n13941543\n30661668\n1234285\n849947\n6252325\n6706394\n19306009\n1127777\n1864036\n7800443\n25214395\n17232028\n5481923\n808367\n8640380\n8919436\n9437604\n10724231\n20806772\n26188980\n28273959\n13030425\n6844934\n8169698\n10790650\n10784017\n19857183\n26981047\n32975039\n721873\n22959255\n1464934\n14564281\n20300318\n17104405\n16078477\n25319561\n27822642\n26172355\n25605542\n12935635\n17909834\n33781993\n17639821\n21153392\n6834449\n8406756\n22959756\n25540121\n18595742\n31989246\n30671623\n9930116\n7606509\n9892131\n3791738\n15889027\n31788166\n23925750\n1395237\n27582994\n10653299\n11433145\n26295635\n34667650\n17919636\n15517453\n17325929\n11400900\n26323379\n26133287\n22382285\n1234261\n24751608",
    "results": "Twenty-nine patients (19 men, 10 women) with 29 nonunions were identified. There were four type I, 15 type II, and 10 type III fracture nonunions. Only 11 fractures were isolated. The mean period from initial injury to final diagnosis was 35.2\u2009\u00b1\u200973.2\u00a0months (range 3-360\u00a0months) (n\u2009=\u200925). The most frequent cause of delayed diagnosis was conservative treatment for fracture in 11 patients, followed by oversight by the physician in 8. The most common reason for seeking medical advice was shoulder pain. Six patients received conservative therapy, and 23 received operative treatment. Fixation materials included various plates in 15 patients, and tension band wiring in 5. Bone grafting was performed in 16 patients (73%, 16/22). Of the 19 surgically treated patients with adequate follow-up, the outcome was rated excellent in 79%.",
    "title": "Nonunion of the so-called acromion: a systematic review with consideration of the terminology.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788503e01a30>"
}