{
    "abstract": "Silastic band laparoscopic sterilization was introduced in the early 1970s as an alternative to unipolar cautery laparoscopy. Banding eliminates burn injury and reduces tubal destruction. However, in comparison with other methods, the success of Silastic banding may depend more on tubal morphology. This case-control study of 70 banding failures and 140 controls matched for age, gravidity, and date of procedure reveals that morphologic abnormalities of pelvic organs (adhesions or tubal thickening) or a history of a disease known to cause such abnormalities (pelvic inflammatory disease) increases the risk of sterilization failure. The risk of failure is further increased if the procedure is performed immediately postpartum or postabortion rather than as an interval procedure.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse, USA.",
            "firstname": "M D",
            "initials": "MD",
            "lastname": "Adelson"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": null,
            "firstname": "W L",
            "initials": "WL",
            "lastname": "Graves"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": null,
            "firstname": "Y W",
            "initials": "YW",
            "lastname": "Ahn"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": null,
    "doi": "10.1089/gyn.1995.11.159",
    "journal": "Journal of gynecologic surgery",
    "keywords": [],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "1996-03-03",
    "pubmed_id": "10172734",
    "results": null,
    "title": "Laparoscopic silastic band sterilization failures.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788506c14040>"
}