{
    "abstract": "The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications in open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.\nData were collected from the SUCCOR database of 1272 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), 2009) who underwent radical hysterectomy in Europe between January 2013 and December 2014. We reviewed the duration of the surgeries, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, intra-operative and post-operative complications. The inclusion criteria were age \u226518 years and histologic type (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma). Pelvic MRI confirming a tumor diameter \u22644\u2009cm with no parametrial invasion and a pre-operative CT scan, MRI, or positron emission tomography CT demonstrating no extra-cervical metastatic disease were mandatory. Outcomes of interest were any grade >3 adverse events, intra-operative adverse events, post-operative adverse events, length of hospital stay, length of operation, and blood loss.\nThe study included 1156 patients, 633 (54%) in the open surgery group and 523 (46%) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Median age was 46 years (range 18-82), median body mass index 25\u2009kg/m\nOur study showed that there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications between minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the open approach.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Daniel",
            "initials": "D",
            "lastname": "V\u00e1zquez-Vicente"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Felix",
            "initials": "F",
            "lastname": "Boria"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Teresa",
            "initials": "T",
            "lastname": "Castellanos"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Monica",
            "initials": "M",
            "lastname": "Gutierrez"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Enrique",
            "initials": "E",
            "lastname": "Chacon"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Nabil",
            "initials": "N",
            "lastname": "Manzour"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Jose Angel",
            "initials": "JA",
            "lastname": "Minguez"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Nerea",
            "initials": "N",
            "lastname": "Martin-Calvo"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.",
            "firstname": "Juan Luis",
            "initials": "JL",
            "lastname": "Alcazar"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain lchiva@unav.es.",
            "firstname": "Luis",
            "initials": "L",
            "lastname": "Chiva"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": null,
            "firstname": null,
            "initials": null,
            "lastname": null
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": "Our study showed that there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of intra-operative and post-operative complications between minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the open approach.",
    "copyrights": "\u00a9 IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
    "doi": "10.1136/ijgc-2023-004657",
    "journal": "International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society",
    "keywords": [
        "Cervical Cancer",
        "Surgery"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2024-04-26",
    "pubmed_id": "38669163",
    "results": "The study included 1156 patients, 633 (54%) in the open surgery group and 523 (46%) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Median age was 46 years (range 18-82), median body mass index 25\u2009kg/m",
    "title": "SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x7885049ec360>"
}