{
    "abstract": "ObjectiveTo determine how lower degree of automation (DOA) reliability impacts human response to a single higher-DOA failure in simulated air traffic control conflict detection.BackgroundHigher-DOA systems apply higher levels of automation to later stages of human information processing. Higher-DOA typically results in better routine performance, and lower-DOA with better automation failure response. If both are provided and lower-DOA is reliable, it could support higher DOA failure detection.MethodParticipants (",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "The University of Western Australia, Australia.",
            "firstname": "Vanessa K",
            "initials": "VK",
            "lastname": "Bowden"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "The University of Western Australia, Australia.",
            "firstname": "Isabella",
            "initials": "I",
            "lastname": "Gegoff"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "The University of Western Australia, Australia.",
            "firstname": "Philippe J",
            "initials": "PJ",
            "lastname": "Kilpatrick"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "The University of Western Australia, Australia.",
            "firstname": "Shayne",
            "initials": "S",
            "lastname": "Loft"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": null,
    "doi": "10.1177/00187208251335536",
    "journal": "Human factors",
    "keywords": [
        "air traffic control",
        "automation failure detection",
        "degree of automation",
        "human-automation teaming"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2025-04-21",
    "pubmed_id": "40257007",
    "results": null,
    "title": "The Impact of Lower Degree Automation Reliability on Higher Degree Automation Failure Detection in Simulated Air Traffic Control.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788506568310>"
}