{
    "abstract": "Current methods for assessing health capital are not accessible to clinicians. To increase accessibility, we evaluated a Brief Adult Health Capital Scale (BAHCS-10) using classical and modern testing theories. With 588 clients, we found an adequate fit for the BAHCS-10",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Centerstone's Research Institute, Bloomington, IN, USA.",
            "firstname": "Matthew",
            "initials": "M",
            "lastname": "Hanauer"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.",
            "firstname": "Dubravka",
            "initials": "D",
            "lastname": "Svetina Valdivia"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": null,
    "doi": "10.1177/1359105320953469",
    "journal": "Journal of health psychology",
    "keywords": [
        "clinical health psychology",
        "health behavior",
        "health care",
        "health promotion",
        "methodology"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2020-09-04",
    "pubmed_id": "32878501",
    "results": null,
    "title": "Validation and utility study of the 10 item brief adult health capital scale (BACHS-10).",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788503d722a0>"
}