{
    "abstract": "Hybrid-abutment crowns and screwmentable crowns offer a fusion of the benefits from both screw and cement-retained restorations, potentially enhancing the overall performance of the restoration.\nThis study aimed to evaluate the screw loosening and fracture strength of hybrid-abutment crowns and screwmentable crowns made with two different materials.\nForty single-crown were made on titanium implants and divided into four groups (n = 10) [SM-Ti: Screwmentable titanium-porcelain crowns on stock titanium abutment; SM-Zr: Screwmentable zirconia-porcelain crowns on stock zirconia abutment; AC-Ti: Titanium-porcelain abutment crowns; AC-Zr: Zirconia-porcelain abutment crowns.] Specimens were torqued with 30 NCm and thermocycled between 5\u2103 and 55\u2103 in 20-second cycles for 5000 cycles. Removal torque values (RTV) were measured. Following the RTV measurement, the screws were changed with fresh screws and torqued again. Afterwards, specimens were loaded to fracture and fracture strengths were recorded, failure modes were examined.\nAnalysis of variance and Bonferroni test was performed.\nThe AC-Ti group displayed the highest mean torque loss (%20.09 \u00b1 6.49) and the SM-Ti group displayed the lowest (%9.59 \u00b1 8.84). Only the difference between AC-Ti and SM-Ti groups was found statistically significant, there are no significant differences between other groups. The fracture strengths are 385.84 \u00b1 27.68 N, 313.18 \u00b1 39.97 N, 272.69 \u00b1 35.03 N, and 156.71 \u00b1 19.83 N for AC-Ti, AC-Zr, SM-Ti, and SM-Zr groups, respectively and all differences were found to be statistically significant. Failures occurred as deformation in titanium components, whereas fractures were observed in zirconia components.\nScrew loosening was observed only in the AC-Ti group. No significant difference was observed among the torque loss values in the remaining groups. Titanium and zirconia materials do not exert any influence on screw loosening after thermal aging for hybrid-abutment crowns. Moreover, when assessing fracture strength, hybrid-abutment crowns exhibit superior strength and durability compared to screwmentable crowns.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Private Practice, \u0130zmir, Turkey.",
            "firstname": "I",
            "initials": "I",
            "lastname": "\u00c7\u00f6tert"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Prosthodontics Bornova, Ege University, \u0130zmir, Turkey.",
            "firstname": "M",
            "initials": "M",
            "lastname": "Ulusoy"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Prosthodontics Bornova, Ege University, \u0130zmir, Turkey.",
            "firstname": "A G",
            "initials": "AG",
            "lastname": "T\u00fcrk"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": "Screw loosening was observed only in the AC-Ti group. No significant difference was observed among the torque loss values in the remaining groups. Titanium and zirconia materials do not exert any influence on screw loosening after thermal aging for hybrid-abutment crowns. Moreover, when assessing fracture strength, hybrid-abutment crowns exhibit superior strength and durability compared to screwmentable crowns.",
    "copyrights": "Copyright \u00a9 2025 Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.",
    "doi": "10.4103/njcp.njcp_772_23",
    "journal": "Nigerian journal of clinical practice",
    "keywords": [
        "Abutment",
        "dental implant",
        "fracture strength",
        "hybrid-abutment crown",
        "screw loosening",
        "screwmentable crown"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2025-04-28",
    "pubmed_id": "40289002",
    "results": "The AC-Ti group displayed the highest mean torque loss (%20.09 \u00b1 6.49) and the SM-Ti group displayed the lowest (%9.59 \u00b1 8.84). Only the difference between AC-Ti and SM-Ti groups was found statistically significant, there are no significant differences between other groups. The fracture strengths are 385.84 \u00b1 27.68 N, 313.18 \u00b1 39.97 N, 272.69 \u00b1 35.03 N, and 156.71 \u00b1 19.83 N for AC-Ti, AC-Zr, SM-Ti, and SM-Zr groups, respectively and all differences were found to be statistically significant. Failures occurred as deformation in titanium components, whereas fractures were observed in zirconia components.",
    "title": "In-Vitro Comparison of Screw Loosening, Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Implant-Supported Hybrid-Abutment Crowns and Screwmentable Crowns Manufactured with Different Materials.",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x7885062e1710>"
}