{
    "abstract": "Previously published studies have shown small prostate size, capsular perforation and intraoperative bladder distension are associated with failed trial without a catheter (TWOC) after HoLEP. The study objective was to determine the relationship between MOSES pulse modulation versus standard laser technology and short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC.\nThe study included 487 patients who underwent HoLEP, using standard holmium laser settings (180 patients) or MOSES pulse modulation (255 patients), between August 2018 and February 2021. Catheter reinsertion defined as reinsertion following failed TWOC within 30 days of surgery. Association of pulse modulation with catheter reinsertion was examined using single and multivariable logistic regression models. Comparisons of pre and intraoperative characteristics between patients treated without and with pulse modulation were made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric characteristics or Fisher's exact test for categorical characteristics.\nShort-term catheter reinsertion occurred in 14% (26/180) of the standard laser setting group as compared with 10% (24/252) of the pulse modulation group. There was no statistically significant association with short-term catheter reinsertion in single (unadjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80-2.91; p=0.12) or multivariable analysis adjusting for specimen weight and operative time (adjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; p=0.25).\nIn this study, we found no association between post-HoLEP short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC and MOSES pulse modulation. Although MOSES pulse modulation offers several well-documented advantages, catheter reinsertion events appear to be attributable to other factors.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.",
            "firstname": "Dane E",
            "initials": "DE",
            "lastname": "Klett"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.",
            "firstname": "Bryce",
            "initials": "B",
            "lastname": "Baird"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.",
            "firstname": "Colleen T",
            "initials": "CT",
            "lastname": "Ball"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA. dora.chandler@mayo.edu.",
            "firstname": "Chandler D",
            "initials": "CD",
            "lastname": "Dora"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": "\u00a9 The Korean Urological Association, 2021.",
    "doi": "10.4111/icu.20210182",
    "journal": "Investigative and clinical urology",
    "keywords": [
        "Cystoscopy",
        "Holmium",
        "Lasers",
        "Prostatic hyperplasia",
        "Urinary catheterization"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2021-11-04",
    "pubmed_id": "34729966\n23167266\n17729384\n20092844\n31978525\n23549294\n31790785\n8970487\n12191038\n9471043\n28882779",
    "results": "Short-term catheter reinsertion occurred in 14% (26/180) of the standard laser setting group as compared with 10% (24/252) of the pulse modulation group. There was no statistically significant association with short-term catheter reinsertion in single (unadjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80-2.91; p=0.12) or multivariable analysis adjusting for specimen weight and operative time (adjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; p=0.25).",
    "title": "Does MOSES pulse modulation reduce short-term catheter reinsertion following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788505f63bf0>"
}