{
    "abstract": "Traumatologists are unable to predict hip instability based on CT scans and standard radiographs in posterior wall (PW) fractures comprising <50-60 % of the wall, necessitating an examination under anesthesia (EUA). Risk factors for instability have not been clarified, but acetabular dysplasia has been theorized as a potential etiology. Unfortunately, dysplasia is difficult to evaluate in the traumatic setting. The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular morphology between unstable and stable fractures with a novel method to detect dysplasia.\nPatients \u2265 18 years old with a PW fracture that underwent an EUA from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively identified. For our experimental measurements, the axial distances on CT between the acetabular dome, lateral acetabular opening, and femoral head vertex were recorded. Acetabular geometry was quantified at these levels. Conventional dysplasia metrics (e.g., Tonnis angle) were obtained. Variables were compared between stable and unstable fractures.\n58 patients met inclusion criteria with 42 stable versus 16 unstable fractures. Unstable fractures had higher distances between the acetabular dome and femoral head vertex (p > 0.05). They had more cranial fracture exit points (p = 0.0015), lower femoral head coverage (p = 0.0102), and lower posterior acetabular sector angles (p = 0.0281). No other differences in acetabular geometry, demographics, injury characteristics, or other markers of dysplasia were identified.\nUnstable hips demonstrated a more recessed acetabular dome when compared to stable hips. Posterior acetabular femoral head coverage and cranial fracture exit point may be related to hip instability. A larger sample size is needed to validate these findings.",
    "authors": [
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.",
            "firstname": "Ravi R",
            "initials": "RR",
            "lastname": "Agrawal"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.",
            "firstname": "Helena F",
            "initials": "HF",
            "lastname": "Barber"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.",
            "firstname": "Eric R",
            "initials": "ER",
            "lastname": "Barnard"
        },
        {
            "affiliation": "Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: anmiller@gmail.com.",
            "firstname": "Anna N",
            "initials": "AN",
            "lastname": "Miller"
        }
    ],
    "conclusions": null,
    "copyrights": "Copyright \u00a9 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    "doi": "10.1016/j.injury.2024.111601",
    "journal": "Injury",
    "keywords": [
        "Acetabular dysplasia",
        "Acetabular inclination",
        "Acetabular version",
        "Cranial exit point",
        "Femoral head coverage",
        "Posterior wall fractures"
    ],
    "methods": null,
    "publication_date": "2024-05-30",
    "pubmed_id": "38810571",
    "results": "58 patients met inclusion criteria with 42 stable versus 16 unstable fractures. Unstable fractures had higher distances between the acetabular dome and femoral head vertex (p > 0.05). They had more cranial fracture exit points (p = 0.0015), lower femoral head coverage (p = 0.0102), and lower posterior acetabular sector angles (p = 0.0281). No other differences in acetabular geometry, demographics, injury characteristics, or other markers of dysplasia were identified.",
    "title": "Acetabular dysplasia and posterior wall fractures: The missing link?",
    "xml": "<Element 'PubmedArticle' at 0x788503946d90>"
}